UNB Libraries: Scholar Research Repository
  • Log In
    Communities & Collections
    Browse
  • What is UNB Scholar?Deposit to UNB ScholarUNB Scholar PolicyContact
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Niazi, Imran K."

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Multiday Evaluation of Techniques for EMG-Based Classification of Hand Motions
    (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2019-07) Waris, Asim; Niazi, Imran K.; Jamil, Mohsin; Englehart, Kevin; Jensen, Winnie; Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu
    Currently, most of the adopted myoelectric schemes for upper limb prostheses do not provide users with intuitive control. Higher accuracies have been reported using different classification algorithms but investigation on the reliability over time for these methods is very limited. In this study, we compared for the first time the longitudinal performance of selected state-of-the-art techniques for electromyography (EMG) based classification of hand motions. Experiments were conducted on ten able-bodied and six transradial amputees for seven continuous days. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA), artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and decision trees (TREE) were compared. Comparative analysis showed that the ANN attained highest classification accuracy followed by LDA. Three-way repeated ANOVA test showed a significant difference (P <; 0.001) between EMG types (surface, intramuscular, and combined), days (1-7), classifiers, and their interactions. Performance on the last day was significantly better (P <; 0.05) than the first day for all classifiers and EMG types. Within-day, classification error (WCE) across all subject and days in ANN was: surface (9.12 ± 7.38%), intramuscular (11.86 ± 7.84%), and combined (6.11 ± 7.46%). The between-day analysis in a leave-one-day-out fashion showed that the ANN was the optimal classifier surface (21.88 ± 4.14%), intramuscular (29.33 ± 2.58%), and combined (14.37 ± 3.10%). Results indicate that within day performances of classifiers may be similar but over time, it may lead to a substantially different outcome. Furthermore, training ANN on multiple days might allow capturing time-dependent variability in the EMG signals and thus minimizing the necessity for daily system recalibration.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Multiday Evaluation of Techniques for EMG-Based Classification of Hand Motions
    (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2019-07) Waris, Asim; Niazi, Imran K.; Jamil, Mohsin; Englehart, Kevin; Jensen, Winnie; Kamavuako, Ernest Nlandu
    Currently, most of the adopted myoelectric schemes for upper limb prostheses do not provide users with intuitive control. Higher accuracies have been reported using different classification algorithms but investigation on the reliability over time for these methods is very limited. In this study, we compared for the first time the longitudinal performance of selected state-of-the-art techniques for electromyography (EMG) based classification of hand motions. Experiments were conducted on ten able-bodied and six transradial amputees for seven continuous days. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA), artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and decision trees (TREE) were compared. Comparative analysis showed that the ANN attained highest classification accuracy followed by LDA. Three-way repeated ANOVA test showed a significant difference (P <; 0.001) between EMG types (surface, intramuscular, and combined), days (1-7), classifiers, and their interactions. Performance on the last day was significantly better (P <; 0.05) than the first day for all classifiers and EMG types. Within-day, classification error (WCE) across all subject and days in ANN was: surface (9.12 ± 7.38%), intramuscular (11.86 ± 7.84%), and combined (6.11 ± 7.46%). The between-day analysis in a leave-one-day-out fashion showed that the ANN was the optimal classifier surface (21.88 ± 4.14%), intramuscular (29.33 ± 2.58%), and combined (14.37 ± 3.10%). Results indicate that within day performances of classifiers may be similar but over time, it may lead to a substantially different outcome. Furthermore, training ANN on multiple days might allow capturing time-dependent variability in the EMG signals and thus minimizing the necessity for daily system recalibration.
University of New Brunswick: established in 1785

General

  • Contact Us
  • Find Us
  • Library News
  • Hours
  • Policies

Libraries

  • Harriet Irving
  • Science & Forestry
  • Engineering & Computer Science
  • Hans W. Klohn Commons
  • Gerard V. La Forest Law

Departments

  • Archives & Special Collections
  • Centre for Digital Scholarship
  • Microforms
  • Government Documents, Data & Maps
  • … more

Join the conversation:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Copyright
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • Web Feedback
  • UNB Libraries
  • Ask Us
  • Feedback
  • Search