Lithogeochemical analysis of the Heath Steele E zone volcanogenic massive sulphide deposit, Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick
Loading...
Files
Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of New Brunswick
Abstract
The Heath Steele E zone Zn-Pb-Cu-Ag volcanogenic massive sulphide deposit lies in the Heath Steele belt in the Bathurst Mining Camp, northeast New Brunswick. The Heath Steele E zone deposit is hosted mainly by felsic volcanic and related volcano-sedimentary rocks of the Nepisiguit Falls Formation (Tetagouche Group), which were deposited in the Tetagouche-Exploits back-arc basin in the Middle Ordovician. The host sequence is affected by locally intense, deposit-related hydrothermal alteration, and polyphase deformation and mid- to upper-greenschist grade regional metamorphism related to inclusion of the host sequence in the Brunswick Subduction Complex.
Numerous geological events have affected the E zone deposit and the host rocks, which have complicated a proper stratigraphic interpretation in the area. Furthermore, the similarity among the various volcano-sedimentary units precludes confident unit correlation among adjacent drill cores on the basis of macro-scale observations alone. For this reason, chemostratigraphy is employed to discriminate among the various volcano-sedimentary units, and for assessment of deposit related hydrothermal alteration using a portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (pXRF) as the main tool. The pXRF is a useful analytical tool for acquiring high-quality results in real-time with a level of resolution that surpasses most other techniques, thereby providing at least 30 potential variables for use in chemostratigraphic characterization and correlation.
The pXRF analysis of eight drill cores of the study area facilitated: 1) the construction of discrimination diagrams that show that the host felsic volcanic rocks in the E zone deposit are rhyodacite/dacite and rhyolite with a tholeiitic magmatic affinity; consistent with an intracontinental back-arc environment, 2) the identification of geochemically distinct rock units in this case, a clear difference between structural hanging wall and footwall was recognized, and 3) qualitative characterization of hydrothermal alteration in the footwall (mainly chlorite-carbonate and chlorite-pyrite-sericite assemblage) and the hanging wall (K-feldspar-sericite and sericite-chlorite-pyrite assemblage).