Design of a semi-automated LiDAR point classification framework
| dc.contributor.advisor | Coleman, David | |
| dc.contributor.author | Amolins, Krista | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-01T16:21:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-01T16:21:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2020-04-21T00:00:00Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Data from airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems are becoming more commonplace and are being used in applications other than traditional remote sensing and GIS applications, such as for archaeological surveys. However, non-expert LiDAR users face challenges when working with LiDAR data or derived products. Anecdotal evidence suggests that many users may not have much knowledge of how a LiDAR product was derived or the qualities of the original LiDAR point cloud. In addition, suitable processing software may not be accessible due to cost or may require extensive training and familiarity with the tools for users to achieve their desired results. This thesis addresses some of the challenges non-expert LiDAR users may face by developing a semi-automated point classification framework that does not require expert user input to classify individual points within the point cloud. The Canadian Airborne LiDAR Acquisition Guideline, released by Natural Resources Canada in 2014, was used as a guide in the development process. The framework consists of a multi-stage classification process that can be applied using LiDAR point clouds exclusively or using LiDAR data integrated with other types of data. Code developed as part of this thesis to implement the framework is hosted in a repository on Bitbucket. The first stage is a ground point identification process that requires little or no operator input to classify ground points within a LiDAR point cloud. It achieved greater than 95% accuracy in sample tests, as compared to available classified ground data. Subsequent stages add or refine classification of points within the point cloud. If only LiDAR data are used, points are classified as building/structure, low vegetation, medium vegetation, high vegetation, unpaved ground, road or paved surface, or points above paved surface. Points that do not meet the criteria for any of the classes are left unclassified. Additional data can be introduced at any stage to improve processing time; add classes, for example, water; or refine results. Recommendations for future research include making greater use of 3D data structures, making greater use of point level information, and improving methods used to refine classification results. | |
| dc.description.copyright | © Krista Amolins, 2016 | |
| dc.description.note | Electronic Only. | |
| dc.description.note | Ph.D. University of New Brunswick, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, 2016. | |
| dc.format | text/xml | |
| dc.format.extent | xvi, 237 pages : illustrations | |
| dc.format.medium | electronic | |
| dc.identifier.oclc | (OCoLC)1151407098 | |
| dc.identifier.other | Thesis 9765 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://unbscholar.lib.unb.ca/handle/1882/13608 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_CA | |
| dc.publisher | University of New Brunswick | |
| dc.rights | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |
| dc.subject.discipline | Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Geospatial data. | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Optical radar. | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Remote sensing. | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Topographical surveying -- Laser use in. | |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Radar in surveying. | |
| dc.title | Design of a semi-automated LiDAR point classification framework | |
| dc.type | doctoral thesis | |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering | |
| thesis.degree.fullname | Doctor of Philosophy | |
| thesis.degree.grantor | University of New Brunswick | |
| thesis.degree.level | doctoral | |
| thesis.degree.name | Ph.D. |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1