Working Papers
Permanent URI for this collection
Working or discussion papers circulated publicly or among a group of peers. Certain disciplines, for example, economics, issue working papers in series. (URI: http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_8042)
Browse
Browsing Working Papers by Subject "Sociology"
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Self-perceived mental health and its gendered and immigration associations(2018) Aspinall, Mary; Gupta, NeeruBackground: Many research designs have analyzed various socioeconomic factors that influence a person’s physical health, such as diabetes. Whether or not these same factors are associated with a person’s mental health have received less attention. Some studies indicate that gender disparities and the migration process may be associated with differential mental health outcomes. Objective: This research examines the relationship between gender, immigrant status, and self-perceived mental health (SPMH) in the Canadian population aged 18 and over. Method: The analysis draws on the latest available Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) public use microdata file, which captured information from a nationally representative sample of 58,574 adults. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore interactions of gender and immigrant status on SPMH, controlling for a range of socioeconomic variables including education and income. Survey weights were applied to allow for generalization of the results to the Canadian population. Results: The relationships between gender, immigrant status, and SPMH were significant, with females more likely to report good SPMH than men (odds ratio=1.16, p<0.05), and immigrants more likely to report good SPMH than non-immigrants (odds ratio=1.05). Discussion: Results indicate that the “healthy immigrant effect” often reported for diabetes and other physical health measures may also be protective for mental health. Women are more likely to rate their mental health as good. However, our examination did not account for clinical diagnosis of mental illness. More research is needed to inform evidence-based policy and practice guidelines in addressing potential gendered and immigration differences in both measured and perceived mental health.Item Sexual minority status and the hospital burden of cardiometabolic diseases: protocol for an observational study using linked survey and hospital data(2019) Gupta, Neeru; Seng, ZihaoThis paper outlines a protocol for a national observational study examining the association between sexual identity and potentially avoidable hospital costs for diabetes and other cardiometabolic diseases. Our aim is to strengthen the evidence base on sexual minority status as a social determinant of health. We will use data from the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) linked to multiple years of acute-care inpatient records from the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD), representing all provinces except Quebec. Sexual identity is captured in the CCHS among respondents ages 18 to 59. Hospital costs measured from DAD data are considered as an aggregate reflection of the frequency and intensity of use of hospital resources to meet essential medical needs. The study falls within a wider program of research with funding from Diabetes Canada, the New Brunswick Health Research Foundation, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of New Brunswick, and Diabetes Action Canada to conduct policy-actionable population health and health services research using existing databases from official statistical sources.Item Systematic review protocol: Examining the effects of introducing pay-for-performance for primary care physicians on diabetes outcomes in single-payer healthcare systems(2017) Gupta, Neeru; Ayles, Holly M.Background: Although pay-for-performance (P4P) for diabetes care is increasingly common across health organizations, evidence of its effectiveness in improving population health and service delivery is deficient. This information gap is attributable in part to the heterogeneity of healthcare financing, covered medical conditions, care settings, and provider remuneration arrangements within and across countries. Objective: This paper outlines a protocol for a systematic review examining the effects of introducing P4P for physicians in primary care and community settings to support guideline- based diabetes care. Our aim is to reduce the heterogeneity of evidence presented that has deterred conclusiveness of previous reviews by narrowing the focus to disease-specific P4P schemes in single-payer healthcare insurance systems. This approach enables us to minimize the risk of unintended consequences of P4P such as physicians’ gaming the payment system. Methods: Our review systematically searches, appraises, and synthesizes the literature concentrating on whether P4P for primary care physicians leads to better diabetes outcomes in single-payer health systems. We search 10 electronic databases and manually scan the reference lists of review articles and other global health literature. We include primary studies evaluating the effects of introducing P4P for diabetes care among primary care physicians in countries of universal health coverage. Outcomes of interest include patient morbidity, avoidable hospitalization, premature death, and healthcare costs. Results: We have received funding from Diabetes Canada and the New Brunswick Health Research Foundation to conduct policy-actionable diabetes health services research. Database searches were conducted and full-texts screened by two reviewers in 2017. We aim to submit the review for publication in 2018. Conclusions: We are narratively synthesizing the data. Because of the wide range of outcomes considered, we do not expect to perform a meta-analysis.