Problem Uncertainty, Institutional Insularity, and Modes of Learning in Canadian Provincial Hydraulic Fracturing Regulation

dc.contributor.authorMillar, Heather
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-17T16:47:13Z
dc.date.available2023-07-17T16:47:13Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-28
dc.description.abstractThis study uses policy learning frameworks to explain variation in processes of hydraulic fracturing regulatory development in Canadian provinces. Using a cross-case comparison of British Columbia and Nova Scotia, the article demonstrates that differences in problem uncertainty and institutional insularity in each province determined modes of technical, social, and political learning in each province. In British Columbia elected officials framed LNG as a safe, clean energy source generating economic benefits. These frames made it difficult for anti-fracking advocates to increase the salience of environmental risks and scientific uncertainty. Low problem uncertainty and high institutional insularity fostered processes of technical learning within the BC Oil and Gas Commission focused on single-issue regulations. In Nova Scotia, an external review provided an ad hoc institutional venue through which environmental advocates, residents, and experts could increase the salience of scientific uncertainty and dread environmental risks. These conditions fostered collective processes of social learning among anti-fracking advocates and political learning among elected officials, resulting in a ban.
dc.description.copyrightThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Problem Uncertainty, Institutional Insularity, and Modes of Learning in Canadian Provincial Hydraulic Fracturing Regulation. Review of Policy Research 37, 6 p765-796 (2020), which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12401. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ropr.12401
dc.identifier.issn1541-132X
dc.identifier.issn1541-1338
dc.identifier.urihttps://unbscholar.lib.unb.ca/handle/1882/37261
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relationSSHRC
dc.relation.hasversionhttps://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12401
dc.relation.ispartofReview of Policy Research
dc.rightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.subject.disciplinePolitical Science
dc.titleProblem Uncertainty, Institutional Insularity, and Modes of Learning in Canadian Provincial Hydraulic Fracturing Regulation
dc.typejournal-article
oaire.citation.endPage796
oaire.citation.issue6
oaire.citation.startPage765
oaire.citation.titleReview of Policy Research
oaire.citation.volume37
oaire.license.conditionother
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Millar_RPR-OA-19-08-0077.R2_Accepted_Proof.pdf
Size:
460.98 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.13 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections